|
|
Definition
OHIO BASEMAP README FILE
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
This readme file gives a short explanation on the Ohio
Basemap files that the Ohio Geological Survey distributes as
part of the Oil & Gas Well Location Digitizing project.
Contact Information: For further information with, or
information about these files, please contact:
James McDonald
Ohio Department of Natural Resources
Division of Geological Survey
4383 Fountain Square Drive
Columbus, OH 434224
Phone: 614-265-6601
E-mail: jim.mcdonald@dnr.state.oh.us
Web Site: http://www.dnr.oh.us/odnr/geo_survey/
1. TYPES OF MAPS AVAILABLE
There are three types of files available to the public
on the CD-ROM. There are two types of county files,
the background and the road files. The background
files have the naming convention of the following:
WAY_SPN.DWG
Where the first three letters generally stands for the
first three letters of a county name, the SPN or SPS
stands for the coordinate system of the digital file.
In these cases, SPN stands for Ohio State Plane
Coordinate System - North Zone, using the North
American Datum of 1927 (NAD27). SPS stands for Ohio
State Plane Coordinate System - South Zone, using the
North American Datum of 1927 (NAD27).
The road files have the naming convention of the
following:
WAYRTE_SPN.DWG
Where the first three letters generally stands for the
first three letters of a county name, the RTE indicates
that the file contains the roads for the county, and
the SPN or SPS stands for the coordinate system of the
digital file. In these cases, SPN stands for Ohio
State Plane Coordinate System - North Zone, using the
North American Datum of 1927 (NAD27). SPS stands for
Ohio State Plane Coordinate System - South Zone, using
the North American Datum of 1927 (NAD27).
We have also included two statewide base maps. These
are named STATE_SPN.DWG and STATE_SPS.DWG. These base
maps contain only the original ODOT features. They do
not contain any of the U.S. Geological Survey DLG
features. Therefore, these two should only be used for
statewide displays, not for any detailed county or
township displays. These maps are not accurate at the
County and Township level.
2. LAYER NAMES
Background File Layer Names (XXX_SPX.DWG)
Layer Name
2 County Polygon
3 Township Polygon
5 Corporation Polygon
6 Urban Area Polygon
7 Census Area Polygon
8 Unicorp Polygon
9 Airport Boundary
10 Quad Lines and Monuments
11 State Lines
12 County Lines
13 Township Lines
14 Section Lines
15 Corporation Lines
16 Urban Area Lines
17 Census Area Lines
18 Unicorp Lines
19 Airport Runway
20 Quad Name
21 State Name
22 County Name
23 Township Name
24 Section Name
25 City Name
26 Urban Area Name
27 Census Area Name
28 Unicorp Name
29 Airport Name
30 Major Lake Polygon
31 Major River Polygon
32 Minor Lake Polygon
33 Minor River Polygon
34 Other Hydro Polygon
35 Irregular Subdivision Lines-Lots or small subdivisions
36 Irregular Subdivision Lines-Intermediate subdivisions
37 Irregular Subdivision Lines-Large subdivisions
38 Section Lines not found on the 1:24,000-scale
topographic maps or 1:24,000-scale DLG files
39 Rail Lines
40 Major Lake Linework
41 Major River Linework
42 Minor Lake Linework
43 Minor River Linework
44 Other Hydro Linework
45 Irregular Subdivision Text-Lots or small subdivisions
46 County Road Name
47 Township Road Name
48 City Street Name
49 Rail Line Name
50 Major Lake Name
51 Major River Name
52 Minor Lake Name
53 Minor River Name
54 Other Hydro Name
55 Interchange layout
56 Irregular Subdivision Text-Intermediate subdivisions
57 Irregular Subdivision Text-Large subdivisions
58 Section Text not found on the 1:24,000-scale
topographic maps or 1:24,000-scale DLG files
60 Township Number (assigned by ODOT)
61 Route Shield Punch Out
62 Route Shield Lines & Text
Route File Layer Names (XXXRTE_SPX.DWG)
Layer Name
11 Interstate
12 United States Route
13 State Route
14 Turnpike
15 Proposed State System
21 County Principal, Mileage Class=1
22 County Subdivision, Mileage Class=2
23 County Within Corp., Mileage Class=8
32 Township Principal, Mileage Class=1
33 Township Subdivision, Mileage Class=2
34 Township Within Corp., Mileage Class=8
41 Municipal Street
Statewide Basemap File Layer Names (STATE_SPN.DWG and
STATE_SPS.DWG)
Layer Name
1 API County Codes
2 State Outline-Thin lines
11 State Outline-Thick Lines
12 County Lines
13 Township Lines
20 County Names-Small
21 County Names-Large
22 Township Names-Large
50 Township Names-Small
3. GENERAL PROCESS IN CONSTRUCTING THE BASEMAP FILES
From: McDonald, J., Wickstrom, L.H., and Steck,
C.D., 1997, History of Ohio's Oil-and Gas-Well
Location Maps and Their Conversion to Digital
Form, in Ohio Geological Society Fifth Annual
Technical Symposium, Akron, Ohio, November 12,
1997: Ohio Geological Society, Columbus, Ohio, p.
52-64.
To produce any sort of accurate product in this
digitization effort, it was necessary to register our
inaccurate paper and mylar township spot maps to an
accurate representation of the land subdivisions for
Ohio. This process is known as "rubber-sheeting." Via a
process called digitizer setup, the operator registers
a number of points on the mylar map (minimum of four
points) to corresponding points on the digital map. The
computer program then stretches and squeezes the input
to minimize error over that area. The setup program
reports error statistics that allow us to judge how
accurate our representation will be. Our accuracy
requirements for spotting wells on a base map must be
less than 100 feet. Some of the mylar townships were so
distorted that a digitizer setup had to be run on each
section/subdivision in the township.
Therefore, the success of this project largely depended
on the accuracy of the digital base map that we used.
There have been a number of previous efforts to build a
digital base map for Ohio, the first started in the
early 1980's by the Ohio Department of Transportation
(ODOT). Between 1980 and 1985 ODOT digitized the
following elements from the U.S. Geological Survey
1:24,000-scale topographic maps: 7.5-minute quadrangle
boundaries; political boundaries such as state, county,
township, and municipal boundaries; Public Land Survey
System (PLSS) boundaries (sections); roads and
railroads; airport locations; and hydrography (streams
and lakes). Another effort to build a contiguous
statewide base map was initiated by the Public
Utilities Commission of Ohio in the late 1980's. These
files did not include the PLSS section lines, which
were of critical importance to our project. There are
other small-scale digital base maps that are available
for use, such as the U.S. Bureau of the Census TIGER
files and the U.S. Geological Survey 1:100,000-scale
digital line graph (DLG) files. Both the TIGER files
and the 1:100,000-scale DLG files were considered to be
too inaccurate for spotting the locations of the oil
and gas wells. In addition, the TIGER files did not
include the PLSS section lines, and the 1:100,000-scale
DLG files did not completely cover the entire state.
The Survey had been using ODOT's digital base maps
since 1987 for smaller scale mapping projects and,
therefore, we were familiar with their structure. When
we started this project we thought these files would be
sufficient for us to build upon. Unfortunately, we
discovered a number of problems associated with these
files. First, although ODOT did perform quality control
on the layers that were of importance to their mapping,
the PLSS lines were not a priority so did not have very
rigorous quality control performed. Initial comparison
of the PLSS lines between the paper 1:24,000-scale-
topographic maps and the digital files showed errors
ranging up to 500 feet. The PLSS layer was one of the
most critical features needed for our project. We had
hoped that by using ODOT's section lines, we would only
have to digitize the irregular subdivisions in the
state. The second major problem discovered in the ODOT
files was the Ohio State Plane Coordinate System zone
boundary. By law, the Ohio State Plane Coordinate
System zone boundary falls along a specified set of
county lines (Ohio Revised Code, 1985). When ODOT
digitized those counties and quadrangles that fall
along the zone boundary, they introduced a distortion
so that neighboring counties in different zones could
be merged seamlessly together without a coordinate
transformation. This distortion ranges anywhere from 0
to 200 feet for those boundary counties, depending upon
distance from the principal meridian. This distortion
affected elements within those county files, rendering
them useless for our needs.
Luckily, several Ohio state agencies, including ODNR,
are involved in a cooperative agreement with the U.S.
Geological Survey (USGS) to convert all the USGS
1:24,000-scale topographic maps to digital line graph
(DLG) files. The resultant DLG files are very accurate
digital representations of the elements comprising the
7.5-minute quadrangles. The contractor for the project
was The Ohio State University's Center for Mapping. The
project is known as Generating Information from
Scanning Ohio Maps (GISOM) (Ramirez, 1997). The DLG
files, when complete, will represent the most accurate,
contiguous, and consistent set of digital base maps
available across the state of Ohio. To obtain the U.S.
Geological Survey DLG files from the State of Ohio over
the Internet, please access the Ohio DLG Web Site:
http://www.geodata.state.oh.us/dlg/ . To obtain the
DLG data on CD-ROM, or if you have any other questions,
please call the State of Ohio's GIS Support Center at
614-644-8041 or send e-mail to dlg@ohio.gov.
Using the new DLG files was considered our best
solution for a number of reasons. These data conform to
the National Map Accuracy Standards for 1:24,000 scale,
which translates to an accuracy of 40 feet (U.S. Bureau
of the Budget, 1947), which meets our accuracy needs.
Another reason for using the U.S. Geological Survey DLG
maps is because they include the hypsography
(topographic contours). No other map series in the
United States has as detailed hypsography as this map
series. The final, and most compelling, reason to use
the DLG files is the accuracy of the PLSS features.
Although the USGS does not claim legal responsibility
for the accuracy of the PLSS data, it was discovered
that considerable effort was made to recover the PLSS
section corners for Ohio. According to the
specifications used to create the topographic maps
(U.S. Geological Survey, 1980), all efforts must be
made to recover the PLSS section corners so that the
PLSS lines can be represented accurately. Examination
of the original source materials stored at the USGS
offices in Rolla, Missouri revealed that the mapmakers
and surveyors collected, in the field, the locations of
the original section corners. The surveyors used copies
of the original survey plats from 1786 to 1820 to
survey and recover the section corners. These copies of
the plats came from the National Archives in
Washington, D.C. This effort to accurately recover and
represent the section corners gave us confidence that
this map series would meet the needs of the oil and gas
industry to locate wells throughout the state of Ohio.
Unfortunately, the GISOM project was not completed by
the time we needed the base map for this project. After
we had finished capturing well locations and attributes
for the western half of the state, we discovered that
the ODOT base map we were using was not accurate enough
for our purposes. We then had to start over again and
build the base map using the DLG files. But, because
the GISOM project was not completed at that point, we
had to digitize some of the political boundaries and
PLSS section lines from the 1:24,000-scale topographic
maps. The quality-control checking of our digitizing of
the political boundaries and PLSS lines indicates that
our work is within National Map Accuracy Standards. We
plan to go back and substitute in the newly released
DLG files for those quadrangles we had digitized.
Because our digitizing conforms to the National Map
Accuracy Standards, replacing our digitizing with the
DLG data will not degrade the accuracy of the digitized
well locations.
In addition, the DLG files were supplemented by adding
the original, irregular land subdivisions. Ohio was the
first state in which the federal government subdivided
the land before it was sold. This process started in
1785, right after the end of the Revolutionary War.
Between 1786 and 1838, many different schemes were used
to subdivide the land. In Ohio, nine major schemes were
used, along with many different minor subdivisions
(Sherman, 1925). Eventually, the federal government
settled upon the scheme that is now known as the Public
Land Surveying System (PLSS). This system was first
applied in the United States in northwestern Ohio. The
PLSS layer in the DLG files does not include the
irregular land subdivisions of Ohio. These irregular
subdivisions occur in the following surveying
districts: Virginia Military District, Ohio Company
Purchase, Donation Tract, Connecticut Western Reserve,
and U.S. Military District. There are also numerous
other small surveys in which irregular subdivisions
occur, such as the French Grants, Refugee Grants, the
Twelve-Mile-Square Tract; these divisions are well
described in Sherman (1925). There are many wells
located by footage calls in these areas of irregular
land subdivisions. Therefore, it was important that we
add the irregular land subdivisions to the PLSS layer
of the DLG files.
We needed to capture the irregular land subdivisions
for our work to accurately digitize the well locations.
The process that we used involved digitizing the
irregular land-subdivision lines from the county
engineer tax maps. In some cases, the irregular land-
subdivision lines were not reliable or could not be
read from the tax maps. In those cases, we used
alternative sources for the irregular land
subdivisions. These sources included Ohio Fuel Gas
township-well-spot maps, Ohio Division of Geological
Survey county base maps, county plat books, Pure Oil
Company township well-spot maps, larger scale
subdivisions from Sherman (1925), Sherman's (1922) map
(used as a secondary source of Virginia Military
District lots), and the Quaker State Oil Company base
maps (used especially as a tertiary source for the
Virginia Military District lots). We would do a
digitizer setup of a township tax map to the digital
base map assembled from the DLG's. If the misclosure
between the township map and the digital base map was
greater than 50 feet, then a digitizer setup was
performed on a smaller area of the tax map. Once an
acceptable digitizer setup was established, the
operator digitized the irregular land-subdivision lines
into the graphics file.
Our resultant digital base-map series now contains new
county, township, section and irregular subdivision
lines either captured from DLG files or digitized at
the Survey. The digital ODOT files have been rectified
to fit these new bases to allow us to use their
hydrography and textual labeling. In the near future,
we plan to bring in the hypsography, hydrography, and
roads from the new DLG files. We then plan to add major
roads and streams to the new digital township well-spot
maps. We also intend to offer 7.5-minute quadrangle
well-spot maps, complete with topographic contours, in
the near future.
Ramirez, J. R, 1997, Generation of consistent digital
geographic data for the state of Ohio: the GISOM
Project: Proceedings of 1997 national GIS/LIS meeting,
Cincinnati Ohio, October 1997, p. 365-373.
Sherman, C. E., 1922, Map of Ohio showing original land
subdivisions to accompany Volume III, Final Report:
Ohio Cooperative Topographic Survey, 1:500,000 scale.
____________ 1925, Original Ohio land subdivisions:
Ohio Cooperative Topographic Survey, Volume III of the
Final Report, 233 p.
U.S. Bureau of the Budget, 1947, United States National
Map Accuracy Standards.
U.S. Geological Survey, 1980, Public-land subdivisions
on 1:24,000-scale maps, in Chapter 4A4, Topographic
instructions: U.S. Geological Survey, 14 p.
4. DETAILED INFORMATION ON EACH COUNTY FILE
Detailed information is listed on the source of the
features in each base map file. All of the ROAD file
(RTE files) features come from the original ODOT files.
The boundary features in the background files, which
include the political boundaries and the PLSS sections,
can come from either the U.S. Geological Survey DLG
files/in-house digitizing of the 1:24,000-scale
topographic maps (the source is indicated as DLG) or
from the original ODOT files. The remainder of the
background file features, such as the hydrography,
railroads, airports, and the text for all the features
comes from the original ODOT files.
COUNTY File Names Data Sources for Features
Adams adarte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
ada_sps.dwg Boundaries-ODOT
Allen all2_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
allrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
Ashland asdrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
asd_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Ashtabula atbrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
atb_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Athens athrte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
ath_sps2.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Auglaize aug2_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
augrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
Belmont belrte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
bel_sps.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Brown brorte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
bro_sps.dwg Boundaries-ODOT
Butler butrte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
but_sps.dwg Boundaries-ODOT
Carroll carrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
car_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Champaign chp2_sps.dwg Boundaries-DLG
chprte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
Clark clarte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
cla_sps.dwg Boundaries-ODOT
Clermont clerte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
cle_sps.dwg Boundaries-ODOT
Clinton clirte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
cli_sps.dwg Boundaries-ODOT
Columbiana colrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
col_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Coshocton cosrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
cos_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Crawford crarte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
cra_spn.dwg Boundaries-ODOT
Cuyahoga cuyrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
cuy_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Darke darrte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
dar_sps.dwg Boundaries-ODOT
Defiance defrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
def_spn.dwg Boundaries-ODOT
Delaware del2_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
delrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
Erie erirte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
eri_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Fairfield fairte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
fai_sps.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Fayette fayrte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
fay_sps.dwg Boundaries-ODOT
Franklin frarte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
fra_sps.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Fulton fulrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
ful_spn.dwg Boundaries-ODOT
Gallia galrte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
gal_sps2.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Geuaga gearte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
gea_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Greene grerte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
gre_sps.dwg Boundaries-ODOT
Guernsey guerte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
gue_sps.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Hamilton hamrte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
ham_sps.dwg Boundaries-ODOT
Hancock hanrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
han_spn.dwg Boundaries-ODOT
Hardin har2_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
harrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
Harrison hasrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
has_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Henry henrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
hen_spn.dwg Boundaries-ODOT
Highland higrte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
hig_sps.dwg Boundaries-ODOT
Hocking hocrte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
hoc_sps.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Holmes holrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
hol_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Huron hurrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
hur_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Jackson jacrte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
jac_sps2.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Jefferson jefrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
jef_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Knox knorte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
kno_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Lake lakrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
lak_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Lawrence lawrte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
law_sps2.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Licking licrte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
lic_sps2.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Logan log2_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
logrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
Lorain lorrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
lor_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Lucas lucrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
luc_spn.dwg Boundaries-ODOT
Madison madrte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
mad_sps.dwg Boundaries-ODOT
Mahoning mahrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
mah_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Marion mar2_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
marrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
Medina medrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
med_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Meigs megrte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
meg_sps2.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Mercer mer2_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
merrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
Miami miarte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
mia_sps.dwg Boundaries-ODOT
Monroe moerte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
moe_sps.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Montgomery motrte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
mot_sps.dwg Boundaries-ODOT
Morgan mrgrte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
mrg_sps.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Morrow mrw2_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
mrwrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
Muskingum musrte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
mus_sps2.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Noble nobrte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
nob_sps.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Ottawa ottrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
ott_spn.dwg Boundaries-ODOT
Paulding paurte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
pau_spn.dwg Boundaries-ODOT
Perry perrte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
per_sps.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Pickaway picrte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
pic_sps.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Pike pikrte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
pik_sps2.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Portage porrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
por_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Preble prerte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
pre_sps.dwg Boundaries-ODOT
Putnam putrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
put_spn.dwg Boundaries-ODOT
Richland ricrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
ric_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Ross rosrte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
ros_sps2.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Sandusky sanrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
san_spn.dwg Boundaries-ODOT
Scioto scirte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
sci_sps2.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Seneca senrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
sen_spn.dwg Boundaries-ODOT
Shelby she2_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
sherte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
Stark starte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
sta_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Summit sumrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
sum_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Trumbull trurte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
tru_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Tuscarawas tusrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
tus_spn2.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Union uni2_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
unirte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
Van Wert van2_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
vanrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
Vinton vinrte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
vin_sps2.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Warren warrte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
war_sps.dwg Boundaries-ODOT
Washington wasrte_sps.dwg Roads-ODOT
was_sps.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Wayne wayrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
way_spn.dwg Boundaries-DLG
Williams wilrte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
wil_spn.dwg Boundaries-ODOT
Wood woorte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
woo_spn.dwg Boundaries-ODOT
Wyandot wyarte_spn.dwg Roads-ODOT
wya_spn.dwg Boundaries-ODOT
|

Sponsored by:

For information regarding advertising rates Click Here!
|